You are viewing mzflux

ÆON
22 November 2036 @ 05:46 pm
 
 
ÆON
24 February 2024 @ 05:04 pm


"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: 'The Lord of the Rings' and 'Atlas Shrugged.' One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs."

 
 
ÆON
SOURCE: http://jezebel.com/lessons-from-a-day-spent-with-the-ucsb-shooters-awful-f-1582884301

v2vl7ti5tpmvhybfdlhd


Tuesday morning, I logged into a chat room full of refugees of the since shuttered PUAHate forum once frequented by University of California-Santa Barbara shooter Elliott Rodger. And I stayed there, silently watching them, for 8 hours. Here's what I learned.

PUAHate, as other outlets have discussed, is an offshoot of the Pick Up Artist community populated by men (and, allegedly, women) who believe Pick Up Artistry to be a sham waste of money not because women are more than "targets" and "prey," but because women are fucking hopeless cunts who can't be convinced to give nice guys a chance. Women, argue PUAHaters, will only go out with good looking alpha males and would never look twice at anyone who isn't a musclebound dreamboat with a six-figure income, and most men will never be those things, and so the world is against them and life is unfair. From an observer's perspective, PUAHate is a group of self-pitying babies who believe they're entitled to women who are much more attractive than they are.

The forum that the group is using as a stopgap between the original PUAHate forum where Elliot Rodger posted and whatever new forum will house them. Participants are able to participate by writing text or by joining in with audio or video. It looks like this:

pp7q6gjchrwdljl3mlof


Over the course of the day, the number of participants in the tinychat ranged from around 10 in the early morning to dozens in the mid-afternoon. And because of character limits on the chat software, the transcript of the day's chat is confusing. In order to make it less so, in the excerpts you'll see below, I've consolidated sentence fragments written by individuals in succession and added punctuation for clarity. Otherwise, the text is as-written.

8:20 AM

I enter the room and into the middle of a conversation that seems like it's about head circumference and jaw surgery. One of the forum members is convinced that if only he goes under the knife to fix his crossbite will any of those contemptible bitches choose to love him.

9:16 AM

Members of the forum start giddily reflecting on Rodger's fame and begin encouraging each other to write manifestos. After one PUAhater shared an image of an average-looking woman and told the room that she gets to have as much sex as she wants, one man with an Australian accent and an obviously electronically modified-sounding voice, intoned,

Are you trying to inspire me to shoot up a super market? What are you trying to do? There's only one solution. I'm going to make a bomb. It's going to be a pretty good gig in Australia soon. Thanks ... for showing me the light.

One user, who was contributing via audio, suggested to the members that they should all begin drafting their own manifestos, explaining,

When you post a video on Youtube it doesn't matter what the police say you've got your version of events on youtube before they have their say.

The Australian, seemingly unaware of the other Englishman's audio, added,

I do believe I have the knowledge to kill 100 people. I believe I have the knowledge to kill the entire school. I know that's pretty pathetic, I think.

Go back to my old school, past assembly, 9:00. Chain every single door. Shoot everybody in the assembly hall.

I AM NOT ONE FOR TRIGGER WARNINGS, BUT BE AWARE, IT GETS WORSE. AFTER READING I FOUND IT PERSONALLY HELPFUL TO REACH OUT TO THE MEN IN MY LIFE WHO I DEEPLY LOVE, IF ONLY TO REMIND MYSELF THAT THERE IS HOPE FOR RECONCILIATION DESPITE THE GENDER DIVIDE.Collapse )

 
 
 
ÆON
20 February 2014 @ 02:06 am

Food stamp recipients document their lives in photos





* Read the article here: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/art/picturing-hunger-in-america/
* Watch the full PBS Newshour report about "Hunger Through My Lens" here: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/breaking-stereotypes-women-use-cameras-aim-at-hunger/


More under the cutCollapse )
 
 
ÆON


Make easy calls to your representatives here: http://thedaywefightback.org/

Find your local protest here: http://thedaywefightback.org/events/


The Day We Fight Back
 
 
ÆON
17 September 2013 @ 12:21 pm

Occupy Wall Street Anniversary Remembered In Shocking Video Of NYPD Arrests

Huffington Post: 09/16/2013 2:22 pm EDT


One day before the two-year anniversary of the Occupy Wall Street movement in New York, a new film sheds light on the NYPD's controversial treatment of protesters.

Created by activist Paul-Henri Sullivan and his brother Justin, the short documentary shows ten arrests over the course of 87 minutes during Occupy's first-anniversary march.

“On the eve of the second anniversary of OWS it bears remembering that the occupations didn’t simply fizzle and dissipate,” said Sullivan, according to The Sparrow Project. "This video, shot last year on the morning of the first anniversary, not only reminds us of how difficult it is to protest when the NYPD is determined to shut you down, but also how the NYPD continues to suppress civil liberties in order to stamp out the movement.”



Watch above as cops, led by a "white-shirt" captain, grab protesters from the sidewalks and handcuff them. Sullivan says cops deliberately created "the spectacle of arrest" in order to intimidate other protesters. 185 protesters were arrested during last year's anniversary march.

A the end of the video, watch as Sullivan himself gets handcuffed.

[VIA The Sparrow Project]

SOURCE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/16/occupy-wall-street-anniversary_n_3935584.html
 
 
ÆON
03 September 2013 @ 01:35 pm

50% Of Americans Oppose Intervention In Syria

onion poll


The Case For And Against Intervening In Syria

While the Obama administration has been considering an armed intervention in Syria following the gassing deaths of hundreds of Syrian civilians, a vocal movement in Congress and among the general public has emerged in opposition of any U.S. military role. Here are the arguments for and against American involvement in the war-torn Middle Eastern nation:

    FOR:

  • It’s the right thing to do, maybe

  • Let American people finally sleep at night after years of being tormented by thoughts of innocent Syrians dying

  • Will put thousands of honest, diligent American Tomahawk cruise missiles back to work

  • We’re the good guys

  • Syrian people deserve to be free of a psychotic, oppressive dictator for a few weeks

  • Moral obligation to our defense industry

  • Footage of missiles being launched off decks of ships, green night-vision images, aerial shots of explosions—all that good stuff

  • Have plenty of money, a fresh, rested military—why not?

  • Be nice to throw Kathryn Bigelow a bone

  • Chance for Obama to put an exclamation point on an already great year

  • It’s been a while since we did one of these things

    AGAINST:

  • Someone might be hurt, or even die

  • Could turn Russia and Iran against U.S.

  • History

  • Fear of setting a precedent of military action without U.N. approval

  • Slight, almost infinitesimal chance intervention might be a completely ineffectual act that even further destabilizes the region, touching off massive anti-American sentiment while allowing jihadist radicals to take power

  • Painful memories of intervening in Rwandan genocide

  • It’s hard

  • Bashar al-Assad just had a baby. A baby!

  • Bush invaded a foreign country. If Obama invades a foreign country, he will be like Bush. It is not good to be like Bush.

  • If we ever want to patch things up with Assad, this won’t exactly make that conversation a cake walk

  • Situation might work itself out

 
 
ÆON

Guardian Editor: U.K. 'Security Experts' Entered Offices And Destroyed Hard Drives

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES: The Guardian, Reuters, NBC News, CNET

guardian

Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, wrote on Monday about an unsettling encounter with "security experts" from the U.K.'s GCHQ intelligence agency.

According to Rusbridger, "a very senior government official" contacted him about two months ago demanding the surrender or destruction of all materials in the publication's possession relating to the surveillance operations uncovered by Edward Snowden.

About a month later, Rusbridger recalls receiving a phone call "from the centre of government" in which he was told, "You've had your fun. Now we want the stuff back." He goes on to explain,
There followed further meetings with shadowy Whitehall figures. The demand was the same: hand the Snowden material back or destroy it. I explained that we could not research and report on this subject if we complied with this request. The man from Whitehall looked mystified. "You've had your debate. There's no need to write any more."
During one meeting, Rusbridger explained to an official that if the British government were to take legal steps in order to roadblock the paper's reporting, the work could simply be done outside of the country. That's when things took a disturbing turn:
The man was unmoved. And so one of the more bizarre moments in the Guardian's long history occurred – with two GCHQ security experts overseeing the destruction of hard drives in the Guardian's basement just to make sure there was nothing in the mangled bits of metal which could possibly be of any interest to passing Chinese agents. "We can call off the black helicopters," joked one as we swept up the remains of a MacBook Pro.
Read moreCollapse )
 
 
ÆON
31 July 2013 @ 11:39 am

The Guardian, Wednesday 31 July 2013 08.56 EDT

• XKeyscore gives 'widest-reaching' collection of online data
• NSA analysts require no prior authorization for searches
• Sweeps up emails, social media activity and browsing history


keyscore


A top secret National Security Agency program allows analysts to search with no prior authorization through vast databases containing emails, online chats and the browsing histories of millions of individuals, according to documents provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The NSA boasts in training materials that the program, called XKeyscore, is its "widest-reaching" system for developing intelligence from the internet.

The latest revelations will add to the intense public and congressional debate around the extent of NSA surveillance programs. They come as senior intelligence officials testify to the Senate judiciary committee on Wednesday, releasing classified documents in response to the Guardian's earlier stories on bulk collection of phone records and Fisa surveillance court oversight.

The files shed light on one of Snowden's most controversial statements, made in his first video interview published by the Guardian on June 10.

"I, sitting at my desk," said Snowden, could "wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant, to a federal judge or even the president, if I had a personal email".

US officials vehemently denied this specific claim. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee, said of Snowden's assertion: "He's lying. It's impossible for him to do what he was saying he could do."

But training materials for XKeyscore detail how analysts can use it and other systems to mine enormous agency databases by filling in a simple on-screen form giving only a broad justification for the search. The request is not reviewed by a court or any NSA personnel before it is processed.

XKeyscore, the documents boast, is the NSA's "widest reaching" system developing intelligence from computer networks – what the agency calls Digital Network Intelligence (DNI). One presentation claims the program covers "nearly everything a typical user does on the internet", including the content of emails, websites visited and searches, as well as their metadata.

READ MORE: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-program-online-data